8

Pope Francis’ Homily at Canonization of John XXIII and John Paul II

Pope Francis, Evangelii Gaudium, The Joy of the GospelAt the heart of this Sunday, which concludes the  Octave of Easter and which John Paul II wished to dedicate to Divine Mercy, are the glorious wounds of the risen Jesus. He had already shown those wounds when he first appeared to the Apostles on the very evening of that day following the Sabbath, the day of the resurrection. But Thomas was not there that evening, and when the others told him that they had seen the Lord, he replied that unless he himself saw and touched those wounds, he would not believe. A week later, Jesus appeared once more to the disciples gathered in the Upper Room, and Thomas was present; Jesus turned to him and told him to touch his wounds.  Whereupon that man, so straightforward and accustomed to testing everything personally, knelt before Jesus with the words: “My Lord and my God!” (Jn 20:28).

The wounds of Jesus are a scandal, a stumbling block for faith, yet they are also the test of faith. That is why on the body of the risen Christ the wounds never pass away: they remain, for those wounds are the enduring sign of God’s love for us. They are essential for believing in God. Not for believing that God exists, but for believing that God is love, mercy and faithfulness. Saint Peter, quoting Isaiah, writes to Christians: “by his wounds you have been healed” (1 Pet 2:24, cf. Is 53:5).

John XXIII and John Paul II were not afraid to look upon the wounds of Jesus, to touch his torn hands and his pierced side. They were not ashamed of the flesh of Christ, they were not scandalized by him, by his cross; they did not despise the flesh of their brother (cf. Is 58:7), because they saw Jesus in every person who suffers and struggles. These were two men of courage, filled with the parrhesia of the Holy Spirit, and they bore witness before the Church and the world to God’s goodness and mercy.

They were priests, bishops and popes of the twentieth century. They lived through the tragic events of that century, but they were not overwhelmed by them. For them, God was more powerful; faith was more powerful – faith in Jesus Christ the Redeemer of man and the Lord of history; the mercy of God, shown by those five wounds, was more powerful; and more powerful too was the closeness of Mary our Mother.

In these two men, who looked upon the wounds of Christ and bore witness to his mercy, there dwelt a living hope and an indescribable and glorious joy (1 Pet 1:3,8). The hope and the joy which the risen Christ bestows on his disciples, the hope and the joy which nothing and no one can take from them. The hope and joy of Easter, forged in the crucible of self-denial, self emptying, utter identification with sinners, even to the point of disgust at the bitterness of that chalice. Such were the hope and the joy which these two holy popes had received as a gift from the risen Lord and which they in turn bestowed in abundance upon the People of God, meriting our eternal gratitude.

This hope and this joy were palpable in the earliest community of believers, in Jerusalem, as we read in the Acts of the Apostles (cf. 2:42-47). It was a community which lived the heart of the Gospel, love and mercy, in simplicity and fraternity.

This is also the image of the Church which the Second Vatican Council set before us. John XXIII and John Paul II cooperated with the Holy Spirit in renewing and updating the Church in keeping with her pristine features, those features which the saints have given her throughout the centuries. Let us not forget that it is the saints who give direction and growth to the Church.

In convening the Council, John XXIII showed an exquisite openness to the Holy Spirit. He let himself be led and he was for the Church a pastor, a servant-leader. This was his great service to the Church; he was the pope of openness to the Spirit.

In his own service to the People of God, John Paul II was the pope of the family. He himself once said that he wanted to be remembered as the pope of the family. I am particularly happy to point this out as we are in the process of journeying with families towards the Synod on the family. It is surely a journey which, from his place in heaven, he guides and sustains.

May these two new saints and shepherds of God’s people intercede for the Church, so that during this two-year journey toward the Synod she may be open to the Holy Spirit in pastoral service to the family. May both of them teach us not to be scandalized by the wounds of Christ and to enter ever more deeply into the mystery of divine mercy, which always hopes and always forgives, because it always loves.


  • What a great and glorious day and what a Blessed time we are living in; two Saints, a first in history.

    Thanks be to God for these great Saints and I pray the Holy Ghost will heal the hearts of those in full or partial communion with the Church who were depressed or disconcerted by these Canonisations.

    • cpsho
      • Actually….. he is. The magesterium has decided such, in the person of the Bishop of Rome, and the Bishops in Communion with him, who presented the petition to the pope, indicating that the canonization by its nature is free from error.

      • Really? It was in all the papers and the Pope, Our Sweet Jesus on Earth, declared it to be so and the Canonisation is infallible and Luke 10:16 tells me to hear the Church which speaks in the name of Jesus whereas the Blog you favor seems to think that Jesus is a liar.

        O, and if you would be so kind, please show me where it is in the Bible that some Blogger has Divinely-Constitued authority?

        Thank you and take some time to repent and return to your Father’s house before your soul is requited of you.

        • cpsho

          A century ago could a Catholic Pope have kissed the Quran?
          150years ago could a Catholic Pope have prayed that St. John the Baptist should
          protect the heretical religion of Islam?

          http://chiesaviva.com/430%20mensile%20ing.pdf

          • You were replied to and now, having ignored that response ,and neglected to answer the question asked of you, you simply plod along the path of additional accusations.

            Go right ahead, Sir but I ain’t playing along.

            If you’d like to address the matter of authority, then we could have some fun 🙂

  • goral

    This is now an epidemic. Our modern day hot shots are using the “period”
    to accentuate the preceding lie. “you can keep your doctor, period!!!”
    “Let me make myself perfectly clear” is another lead in line, with a lie following.
    Even with these prompts, the unwashed, unchurched, uncivilized,
    unhinged masses continue to raise their blood sugar, feasting on the lies.
    How much do you want to bet that the one voted for the other?