2

Right in Our Own Eyes

“In those days, there was no king in Israel.  Everyone did what was right in his own eyes” —  Judges 17: 6 (ESV).

 You have to hand it to the British… they don’t mince words.  Speaking of the violent civil unrest that erupted across London in recent weeks, Prime Minister David Cameron offered a frank assessment of the motives — or lack thereof — behind the chaos:
 
“These riots were not about race,” he said. “These riots were not about government cuts … And these riots were not about poverty.  No, this was about behavior … people showing indifference to right and wrong; people with a twisted moral code; people with a complete absence of self-restraint.”

In America and most of the western world, where political correctness rules, such conclusions strike a dissonant chord.  How dare Mr. Cameron dismiss the certain sociological, cultural, and political underpinnings of the civil unrest!  How dare he ignore the obvious culpability that he and the rest of the government bear for inciting what is clearly just a cry for help from London’s masses?  What’s needed is a study, not a crackdown!  These people need help in the form of government assistance, and above all, understanding
 
Of course, this is balderdash, and Mr. Cameron deserves credit for saying so.  He is absolutely correct when he says that the reigning cult of moral relativism that has begun to erode civil society from the inside out must be countermanded.  Champions of a postmodern society in which “anything goes” like to imagine they are advocating a noble and just view of human liberty and dignity, but in their quest for absolute autonomy, they cast aside the moral obligations inherent to our humanity.
 
What more can we expect from a society that increasingly embraces a materialist worldview, in which man is not a Created Being but a biochemical product of random chance?  Having rejected the idea of any metaphysical significance, the only thing left to define human society and the individuals that comprise it is the material world, where virtue is moot,  might makes right, and values are in the eyes of the beholder.  In such a world, there is no basis for rational discourse.  Everything in the moral arena is subject to dispute; it’s all relative, whatever floats your boat.  All we can know is that which can be quantified and verified, and since we can do neither with so-called moral and spiritual truths, there are no absolutes in those arenas of life.
 
Therefore, if you feel unhappy about your life, or are merely bored and decide you don’t want to work but would prefer to riot in the streets, assault peace officers and violate private property, who’s to tell you that it’s wrong?  Who’s to tell you that you ought to respect the rule of law regardless of how you feel about it at the time, or whether there is anyone to stop you from breaking it?
 
Our culture is paying a price for such nonsense.  As we lose our cultural consensus on basic questions of right and wrong, the fabric of society is unraveling. There was a time, not too long ago, when shared cultural conceptions forged the basis for our interactions with others and the way we ordered ourselves.  It was understood that there is a God to whom every man is ultimately accountable; that human beings are created in God’s image and of infinite worth, value and dignity and that we should treat each other as such; that because of our special nature, we have been endowed with unalienable rights by our Creator; that government exists to secure those rights and is to operate with the consent of the governed. 
 
Because this consensus was widely shared, ordered liberty flourished and the role of government was limited.  Thanks to notions of moral relativism however, the social consensus is unwinding.  As Mr. Cameron has pointed out, notions of radical individualism are prevailing and we are losing any sense of larger social obligations.  If it feels good do it; if the baby is inconvenient, kill it; if you want it take it; if you want to marry it, be my guest!  As the social consensus erodes, chaos ensues until ultimately, the people look to government to restore order and Hobbes’ Leviathan is born. 
 
It’s not too late to turn things around, but it will take a monumental effort on the part of every person to live lives of responsibility, dignity, and virtue and to teach their children to do the same.  Failing this, we’re slowly but surely weaving the web of our own destruction.


Kenneth L. Connor is the Chairman of the Center for a Just Society, 1220 L St. NW, Suite 100-371, Washington, DC 20005. Email: info@centerforajustsociety.org and website: http://www.centerforajustsociety.org.
Filed under:
  • Well said. And politically courageous of PM Cameron to call it forthrightly, and not as the spin doctors dictate. Please see also my “UK Riots & Malaise in the West,” http://www.catholiclane.com/uk-riots-and-malaise-in-the-west/

  • I know I will be condemned for saying this but notice that I DON’T CARE about political correctness and the condemnations of the political left (or right for that matter.)

    Here in the US we have been experiencing “flash mobs” that rob businesses and cause mini-riots in some cities. Notice that among the vandals there is a predominant group of a certain race. Since that race “officially” can’t do no wrong then we have to dig into the rationalization barrel (we are currently scrapping the bottom of it) and find some excuse for the barbaric behavior.

    This nation continues to pay for the sins of the past (slavery for example) but the curious thing is that those most negatively affected by the riots and disorder are the ones who perpetrate it. Look at the 1968 riots in DC. Some neighborhoods never came back from that. The losers where the very neighborhoods that rioted. The upper crust neighborhoods are still there, the riots did not affect them much.

    When one looks at culture, yes, the black American family was destroyed, black culture was destroyed also. Anyone who judges that P.Diddy or Snoop Dogg represent today’s version of Ellington or Basie has to be consuming some illegal substance!

    I conclude that ENEMY NUMBER ONE of the poor and the oppressed is Liberalism in its many forms. It is an insidious enemy because it bamboozles its own victims convincing them that they are “among friends” before burying the dagger in their unsuspecting backs.

    Welfare, legal abortion, “family” law, massive education systems, etc. are the weapons of mass destruction of that ilk.

    Mr. Cameron is right in his judgment but he should be more “inclusive” and lay the blame where it belongs: in the promoters of the British welfare state. The rioters are merely the chickens that have come home to roost. As usual it will be those poor b******s that believed in Liberalism siren’s song that will lay on the street with a bullet in the chest or a broken skull. The politicians and professors will still be sipping their drinks up in their ivory towers and tallying up the useful idiots they sent to a sure death.