2

Occupy in Our Hearts and Minds

I wish, as I first read the article by Marybeth Hicks, “Some Belated Parental Advice to Protestors”, that I had stayed calm long enough to read the blurb after the article and to realize that it was actually written for the Washington Times, not for a Catholic publication.  I only realized this when I read James Tucker’s article in reply, “Catholic Media: Right and Wrong Approaches to the Occupy Movement”. Thank you, James, for sharing this point and for your insight.

As anyone who knows me from my blog knows, I don’t generally write about politics.  I write about prayer, faith, love; sometimes personal, individual economics; and how to try to accept, or rise above, or go around, hardships and handicaps that may come our way.  Nor do I intend to begin now to discuss politics.  My comments here are not about the Occupy Movement itself.   I just wish to comment on some of the points that Marybeth Hicks made.    

First, Marybeth says, “…five things the OWS protesters’ mothers should have taught their children but obviously didn’t…” 

Really?  Many of the people I’ve known in my 58 years don’t always believe, or do, exactly what their parents “taught” them at every moment in their lives.  To be fair, as she is a professional columnist, I suppose it was a ‘good lead-in’ to catch people’s attention. 

Secondly, she says, “Life isn’t fair. The concept of justice – that everyone should be treated fairly – is a worthy and worthwhile moral imperative on which our nation was founded. But justice and economic equality are not the same.”

No, not economic equality, per se, not everyone having the same; but economics does enter into social justice in some way.  Justice and charity would indicate that we help our fellow man, in some way, as we are able, when he has no job or no income or when he is ill.  The political questions which I will not address, since I don’t deal in politics, would be how we go about that…how much through government aid, how much through charitable works, how much through regulation of industry, etc.

Thirdly, she said, “There is no magic money machine to tap for your meandering educational careers and “slow paths” to adulthood….” 

James addressed the magic money machine, but my question is who has meandering educational careers and “slow paths” to adulthood?  And who doesn’t?   How do you decide this?   I see a lot of people who are not in the elite class, who go to community colleges; who work full time jobs and go to school one class at a time (talk about a slow path to a degree, but they persevere); and all manner of people who do whatever it takes to try to better their lives. 

Fourthly, she commented, “Serious people in a sober pursuit of social and political change don’t dance jigs downSixth Avenuelike attendees of a Renaissance festival.”

Oh dear.  I liked what James said about Christian joy.  But also, as I first read this comment, I thought of A Tale of Two Cities.  Has Marybeth read this book?  Would you rather they have knives and axes and guillotines?  Let them dance! 

Fifthly, she admonishes the Occupy people, “There are reasons you haven’t found jobs. The truth? Your tattooed necks, gauged ears, facial piercings and dirty dreadlocks are off-putting.”

I like what one of the commenters said – that she has tattoos and has a job.  I, myself, know a skillful, hard-working woman who has a lot of tattoos and has a good job at world-renowned Johns Hopkins University.  I’m not personally recommending tattoos, in places where they show, for going to job interviews; I’m just saying that this is a sweeping generalization.  When Marybeth says “dirty dreadlocks” is she referring to cleanliness or does she not like dreadlocks?  I’m a middle-aged white mother from the suburbs, and I think most dreadlocks look really good.  You don’t have to think they look good, but it’s just a style; there is nothing moral or immoral about them.  I suppose they might get dirty if you’re camping out for days.

Sixth, and the last that I want to comment on, she says: “Occupy reality: Only 4 percent of college graduates are out of work. If you are among that 4 percent, find a mirror and face the problem. It’s not them. It’s you.” 

I’m trying to take some deep breaths before I comment on this one.  Thankfully I have low blood pressure or it would have gone through the roof.  Where did the 4 percent number come from?  Even if it were true (though no reference is given to make me think it is), how many college graduates are actually working in the profession for which they got an education?  How many college graduates get adequate jobs right out of college?  How many people who graduated from college are under-employed, making minimum wage or not much more, or working part time?

How many people who graduated from college decades ago have been laid off from long-time careers?  How many people who would otherwise be retired, lost their money during years when they didn’t have jobs, and now, instead of being able to retire, are occupying jobs the new college graduates might otherwise have?  I can tell you the answer to these questions is “many” – because I know many of them personally, as some of them are my family members, relatives, friends, and friends of friends.

How many college graduates walk or take public transportation because they can’t afford a car?  I know them!  How many college graduates live with their parents?  Many!  I wrote an article on my blog several years ago about ‘house rules for adult children living with their parents’, and I get multiple hits on it every single day.  I know people in all these circumstances and while they are not perfect and neither am I and neither is anyone else, in most cases – although they need to keep their heads high, pray, and keep on trying –most of the time: it’s not them!

Occupy reality?  Yes.  I don’t pretend to have the political answers to the problems; but the greatest reality, in my opinion, is that we need to pray, hope, and love.  Yes, I grew up in the sixties, but I don’t mean fuzzy, feel-good love.  I mean love God first, and then love Him by respecting in our hearts and minds the greatest of His creation, men and women of every socio-economic class and persuasion, always imperfect and struggling, but always worthy of being loved.


Margaret Mary Myers is a Catholic wife and mother of six adult children. She has written articles for compilation books and for various homeschooling magazines. She homeschooled her six children for 26 years. She also writes children's books. Visit her blog at http://margmary.blogspot.com.


  • fishman

    Hmm… having read both articles. I’m not really sure you are quite on point.
    I think the article you are addressing was written as humor piece. So commenting on things like “most people children don’t follow their parents” makes me question if you misread the satire or not?

    Some of the other points are interesting, the 4% number has been bandied about a lot ,but i think you are spot on. The reality is the correlation doesn’t equal cause.

    Likely those with college degrees are less likely to be unemployed as much because they have a better support system and more family help, as any other reason. So cherry picking various statistics and using them to bludgeon political opponents is not very honest. It is however the ‘norm’ in the new media from what i can tell. Makes you sound all scientific 1% 4% etc.

    The reality underling the statistics is always more complicated.
    On the other hand the occupy wall street folks have demand things like
    completely free access to a college education. ( the source of the ‘meandering path to adulthood’ comment).

    So your criticism of the point is off the mark in the respect that you do not actually address the group the comment was aimed at. You identify a completely different group, most of whom are not attempting to ‘occupy wall street’ and then hold them up as a counter example to a criticism that was not aimed at them or anyone like them. As most of them probably see that totally free college education for all is impractical if not unreasonable.

    As someone who worked 3 jobs to get through college and minimize my student loans. I think the idea of the government funding ( and therefore controlling ) the bulk of education in this country is a horrible idea !!

    So it seems to me you either didn’t get the joke , or missed the point. You at least would have done better to point out you realized much of the article was intended as humor.

  • Fishman, thank you for commenting. It’s always nice to know that someone is reading and thinking, and willing to contribute.

    I would like to ask you, though, if you are going to put something I have said in quotation marks, to please quote me correctly. 🙂 What I said about parents and children was, (emphasis added now) “MANY of the people I’ve known in my 58 years don’t always believe, or do, EXACTLY what their parents “taught” them AT EVERY MOMENT IN THEIR LIVES.” I didn’t say: “most people children don’t follow their parents”, as you put it. Just to let you know, from everything I’ve read, most children (most? many? some go so far as to say most) may follow their parents’ general values fairly closely once they reach a certain adult point in their lives. But I was saying: Don’t take what someone does at any given time and attribute it to their parents not having taught them. But I did say I thought she used it as a literary technique.

    Was the original article intended to be humorous, as you suggested? Or was it intended to be satire, as you later suggested? As I see it, there is a difference. Both irony and exaggeration can be used as either humor or satire, depending on how they are used, but satire is contemptuous. I just like to encourage everyone to respect one another, and look for the good, regardless of economics, creed, race, education, dress, and even decisions.

    By the way, I liked what you said about the college “statistics”, that graduates may “have a better support system and more family help”.

    Thank you again for sharing.

    Margaret Mary