Luthers Today

Luther's 95 ThesesFrom Germany yet again today rises the aroma of dissent. Whether this will ripen into schism or outright heresy will be clear after the conclusion of this fall’s Synod on the Family. Some modern-day princes of the German Church and numerous German bishops are, as did Martin Luther some centuries ago, attempting to heretically alter Church teaching and to rewrite Holy Scripture.

They seek to change Jesus’s words to the woman caught in adultery: “Go now and sin on more.” They either excise or reinterpret passages like 1 Corinthians 6:9 (“Nor will men who lie with men . . . possess the kingdom of God”) so that voluntarily engaging in homosexual acts becomes virtue instead of sin.

German Cardinal Walter Brandmüller, a former head of the Vatican’s commission for historical sciences has spoken regarding German church leaders who support a change in doctrine that would admit divorced and civilly remarried Catholics to Holy Communion. He has called the leaders heretics and said that they put the unity of the Catholic Church at risk.

In an interview with LifeSite News, Brandmüller said that those who support such changes are “irresponsible” and “in contradiction to the teaching of the church.” He was responding to a proposal, put forward last year by fellow German Cardinal Walter Kasper, for remarried Catholic divorcees to receive Holy Communion after a period of penance. Brandmüller’s criticism is directed to fellow bishops and cardinals, including Cardinal Walter Kasper, Cardinal Reinhard Marx, and Bishop Franz-Josef Bode. Bishop Bode will be one of the German church’s representatives at the Synod this Fall.

Cardinal Marx has also been criticized by German Cardinal Gerhard Muller, prefect of the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Regarding the effort to make it appear that the German bishops’ conference has control over church doctrine in Germany, Cardinal Muller said:

This is an absolutely anti-Catholic idea that does not respect the catholicity of the Church. Episcopal conferences have authority over certain issues, but not a magisterium alongside the Magisterium, without the Pope and without communion with the bishops. . . . This kind of attitude risks in fact the reawakening of a certain polarisation between the local Churches and the Church universal, out of date since the Vatican I and Vatican II councils. The Church is not a sum of national churches, whose presidents would vote to elect their chief on the universal level. (Interview of Cardinal Muller in Famille Chrétienne, translation by Rorate Caeli).

Dissent and heresy are not without precedent in Germany. Martin Luther not only excised parts of Holy Scripture which were troublesome to his new religion, he also added to Scripture so that it would accord with his new theology. Luther, acting on a dubious enlightenment, took upon himself the role of determining the canon of Scripture and deleted the Epistle of James, the epistle which has the inspired words that gutted Luther’s attacks on the hierarchy and on the status of the centuries-old traditions of the Church, God’s inspired words that had to be erased since they directly contradicted Luther’s sola fide (faith alone) basis for overthrowing the Church’s authority:

What will it profit, my brethren, if a man says he has faith, but does not have works? Can the faith save him? . . . So faith too, unless it has works, is dead in itself . . . But dost thou want to know, O senseless man, that faith without works is useless? . . . You see that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only . . . For just as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith also without works is dead (James 2).

Luther also added the word alone (allein in German) to Romans 3:28 so that it would read: “For we reckon that a man is justified by faith alone . . . ”

And God bless Luther’s heart. At the very least he was not shy and did not attempt to pass off what he had done as some correct translation, an interpretation to recognize the “signs of the times,” or “sensus-fidelium” required re-interpretation of God’s Word. He simply and candidly said that this was the way he wanted it, that the German language required this for the sake of clarity, and this is what he needed scripture to say to buttress his new religion that should supplant that of the Roman Catholic Church:

If your papist makes much useless fuss about the word sola, allein, tell him at once: “Dr. Martin Luther will have it so” . . . Papist and donkey are one thing . . . For we do not want to be pupils and followers of the Papist, but their masters and judges. (Schaff, Philip, History of the Christian Church, Vol. VII, p. 362)

But Luther did not stop there. Mirroring St. Paul’s words in 2 Cor. 11, Luther went on in proclaiming himself as the authority on God’s word:

Are they doctors? So am I. Are they learned? So am I. Are they preachers? So am I. Are they theologians? So am I. Are they disputators? So am I. Are they philosophers? So am I. Are they writers of books? So am I. And I shall further boast: I can expound Pslams and Prophets, which they cannot. I can translate, which they cannot . . . Therefore the word allein shall remain in my New Testament, and though all the pope-donkeys should get furious and foolish, they shall not take it out. (Scahff, ibid. p. 363).

Luther had much to say about sinning, including the view that those who believe in God, those who have faith, are free to engage in adultery:

God only obliges you to believe and to confess (the faith). In all other things He leaves you free, lord and master to do whatever you will without any danger to your conscience, it makes no difference whether you leave your wife . . . What is it to Him if you do or do not do such things. (Luther’s Works, Weimar edition, XII, p. 131).

Those in Germany today proposing changes in Church doctrine are making an effort to camouflage the changes theologically and scripturally by saying that God’s mercy can and should embrace, as should the Church, the divorced and remarried and those in a loving homosexual relationship. This is a restatement of Luther’s heresy about mercy:

Be a sinner and sin strongly (Esto peccator et pecca fortiter), but believe and rejoice even more firmly in Christ, the conqueror of sin, of death, and of the world. During this life, we have to sin. It is sufficient that, by the mercy of God, we know that Lamb who takes away the sin of the world. Sin will not separate us for Him, even though we were to commit a thousand murders and a thousand aldulteries per day. (Luther, Briefe, Sendschreiben und Bedenken, DeWette editor, Berlin, 1825-1828)

Today’s German Princes of the one true Church provide much more than an echo of what Luther said and did. Their re-write of the Bible and their new doctrines are evident in their heretical declarations:

  • Those in loving adultery and in caring homosexual relationships, who, although they do not have the “fullness” of marriage, have a portion of the good of marriage.
  • The correct scope of God’s mercy can include these folks here and now since the German church is not a “subsidiary of Rome.”
  • “Pastoral innovation” in Germany is their sovereign province and bailiwick; they can do what needs to be done to “shepherd” their people.

There is no need to further elaborate on the precise parallels between Luther’s program for rebellion and the schema of today’s rebellious German Princes of the Church. They repeat Lucifer’s, the light bearer’s, non serviam and they are truly modern day Luthers.

In the end, the Holy Spirit is with the Church until the end of time, and the gates of hell, German or otherwise, will not prevail against it.

[Author’s note: For a detailed discussion of the history of Luther, his heresies, and his re-write of the Bible, see Not By Faith Alone by Robert A. Sungenis.]

Guy McClung is a granddad who loves his children and grandchildren, and as a Patent Attorney helps people develop inventions. He lives in San Antonio Texas with his wife Karen who has stayed with him for 41+ years.
  • Emily Kimmel

    Odd that it’s German…I hadn’t thought about that.

    • goral

      I don’t think it’s odd, it’s pretty much expected. Heresies have found a welcome home in the Anglo-Saxon world. It’s also pretty much expected that this pope would put their agenda at the forefront of the Synod. Luther may yet become a doctor of the church.

      • Emily Kimmel

        The pope hasn’t commented on their agenda, so far as I am aware, and he’s made numerous statements defending the sanctity of marriage and it’s identity as between a man and woman. I don’t understand why you’re mentioning the pope here at all, this article is about a select group of bishops.

        • goral

          Cardinal Kasper said last fall that a “growing majority” of synod members supported his position. And he has claimed to be promoting what Pope Francis wants.
          The retired German bishop, former Curial official and the man often called “the Pope’s theologian,”…..

          This is a quote from an article in the NCR.

          Yes, the pope has made statements supporting the sanctity of marriage, The pope has also proposed the synod and allowed the liberal bishops to set up their agenda. If you don’t understand why the pope is mentioned in conjunction with the activity of the bishops he appoints/selects then further comments are aimless.

        • Guy McClung

          Why “mentioning the Pope” ? Bear with me-lots of info, but to sum up here’s why: Synod = Pope, Pope = Synod. This Synod is of the Pope, by the Pope and for the Pope and those who are like-minded. The Pope starts the ball rolling, and only he can, for a Synod; he decides who gets to be there and he decides the agenda. A Synod is not a Council: a Synod cannot decide anything, it cannot “resolve qustions” nor can it “issue decrees;” a Synod is not a legislature, but only a consultative body. The Pope may or may not sign off on the Synod’s final report. The report is not part of the Magisterium.

          see The Code of Canon Law(Can. 342-348).

          From The American Catholic: “. According to the Synod’s own rules, stablished and approved by those appointed by Pope Francis to run the Synod, in order to be included in the Relatio each paragraph had to receive a 2/3’s majority of voting members. Some paragraphs, on Communion for the divorced and civilly remarried and on homosexuality, very controversial
          paragraphs, did not receive 2/3’s as a sign of “consensus”. They received 1/2, but not 2/3’s (therefore, not “consensus”). That means that
          they shouldn’t have been included in the Relatio Synodi. However, Pope Francis decided that they should be included anyway. He overrode the
          rules of the Synod.”

          From : Blog For Dallas
          Area Catholics: Cardinal Baldisseri confirms Pope
          Francis directed inclusion of heterodox statements in Synod final “Relatio”: by Tantumblogo
          Via 1 Peter Five, confirmation of what we’ve already
          known from Pope Francis’ right hand man at the Synod. This confirmation apparently also came out of the conclave featuring many leading family associations held at the Vatican recently, which I discussed in a post yesterday: . . . Why did the final Relatio published in the Lineamenta include the paragraphs on homosexuality,
          extra-marital cohabitation and Communion for the divorced-and-remarried that failed to gain the approval of the Synod Fathers in October? (Paragraphs
          52,53,55 in the Italian; the English has a slightly different numbering system.) “It was the Pope’s
          decision to include the points that did not receive the two-thirds majority,” Cardinal Baldisseri responded. “The Pope said: ‘These three points received an absolute majority. They were therefore not rejected
          with a ‘no,’ as they received more than 50 percent approval.”

          • goral

            Very keen and incisive comments and stats regarding this popes Obamaesque methods of driving his agenda. All lefties use the same methods, circumventing even their own rules. When you’re the god and know it all you can do that, Luther did.
            On another matter, why does a bishop emeritus have so much influence? Seniority? I can go along with that. Let’s allow the Pope Emeritus the same privilege. If we allow the skirting of laws throughout then we have a mess in the Church, and we do. Pope Francis’ Synod wants to legitimize the mess.